By Douglas V. Gibbs
Back in 2008 Obama was established as not only a pro-abortion candidate, but one that believes in infanticide as evidenced by his lack of support of an anti-infanticide bill in Illinois. The bill, if it had become law, would have outlawed the killing of babies that survive abortion. As a black candidate, and one very popular with the black community, it seemed like a contradiction, because Planned Parenthood was created by Margaret Sanger with the intent of using the program to wipe out blacks, which she considered to be an inferior race. Abortion in America was originally promoted as a tool to kill minorities before they could be born. For pro-life groups, the very thought of killing any child in the womb is murder, and by many is considered to be America's genocide.
Planned Parenthood supports Barack Obama, and is currently stepping up their efforts to ensure his reelection. They are pumping money into his campaign, saying their support is in relation to the issues of "health" and "economics."
Planned Parenthood endorsed Obama's reelection earlier this week, saying Romney's positions are harmful on women's health, despite the fact that most abortions have nothing to do with a woman's health, and are performed more often as a convenience. These women who use Planned Parenthood for access to abortion services, more often than not, consider a child an inconvenience.
The argument against Romney coincides with the liberal left's current "War on Women" campaign, an argument they also used while debating against the bill that would ban abortions based on the sex of the child.
The money being used to support Obama's campaign, when one considers the government subsidies Planned Parenthood receives, is your tax dollars.
The concept of liberty is left out when the liberal left democrats argue in favor of terminating the lives of unborn kids. A person has the liberty to use birth control, or to not have sex, if they don't wish to become pregnant. Abstinence is 100% effective, in fact. Sex is a choice, and a behavior that, if pregnancy is the result, should not be picked up by the tax payer. In fact, from a Constitutional point of view, the federal government has no authority to be funding Planned Parenthood, or to be involved in the abortion issue in any way.
So, blood money by the federal government spent to kill babies, and provided against any constitutional legal authority, is being used to support the campaign of Barack Obama. Meanwhile, the promotion of free contraceptives by the government through Obamacare, and the ability to end the life of a child at pretty much any stage of pregnancy, promotes poor sexual behavior without the worry of consequences for their actions (aside from STDs).
Interestingly, this is only the third time Planned Parenthood has endorsed a candidate for president. Planned Parenthood sees this as a fight for its own survival, since Republicans have become more active in pro-life legislation, including following the Constitution in their efforts to cut off all federal government funding to Planned Parenthood, and any other group that provides access to abortion.
In their support for Barack Obama, aside from endorsing Obama, and providing funds for his campaign, Planned Parenthood has launched a $1.4 million advertising campaign attacking Romney's opposition to abortion, and his desire to eliminate Planned Parenthood.
It is understood that if the abortion of babies ever ends, it would also be the end of Planned Parenthood, so it is no surprise they are supporting Obama as they are with their blood money. For them, it is a matter of survival. A Republican President with a Republican Congress could spell the beginning of the end for Planned Parenthood.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Planned Parenthood Pours $1.4 Million to Obama Campaign - The Loft: GOP USA
House Votes to Defund Planned Parenthood - Politico
No comments:
Post a Comment